The Kyoto Now campaign is a national movement to support the
ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, a global environmental treaty drafted in
1997. The treaty was inspired by reports such as those by the United Nations’
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which concluded in its 1995
report that global warming is real, is caused by human factors, and, if left
unchecked, will result in devastating consequences such as climate change and
coastal destruction within this century. Numerous studies since have confirmed
these findings. In 1997, the major industrial powers met in Japan to establish
standards for counteracting this problem. The result of this conference was the
Kyoto Protocol, which set a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 7%
below 1990 levels for the United States, with similar goals for Europe (8%) and
Japan (6%). Russia and other industrialized nations were held to somewhat lesser
standards. Some have criticized the Kyoto Protocol for leaving out developing
nations, but the fact remains that the United States and other parties to the
Kyoto conference have accounted for the vast majority of greenhouse gas
emissions thus far. The United States is particularly culpable, with Americans
consuming about 19 million barrels of oil and 6 billion cubic feet of natural
gas every day. Also, developing nations feel that they deserve the same
opportunities for industrialization that first-world countries enjoyed.
Global warming is real,
is caused by human factors, and, if left unchecked,
will result in...climate change and coastal destruction within this century.
|
After George W. Bush refused to ratify this treaty on March 28, the Kyoto Now
campaign gained steam on campus, with supporters arguing that without federal
adoption of the Kyoto standards, communities would have to take it upon
themselves to set environmentally responsible goals. The Cornell Greens, a
non-partisan activist group that has spearheaded the Kyoto Now movement on
campus, hopes that Cornell University will become an example for other colleges
and universities across the nation. With its recent decision, Cornell joined a
short but growing list of institutions that have accepted their responsibility
despite the Bush administration’s abandonment of the Kyoto Protocol. Bush
claimed that in determining the United States’ environmental policies, we
should give priority to our economic demands, in what he calls the "America
First" policy. An apt name, given that America is the number one polluter
in the world, emitting 25% of the world’s carbon dioxide despite only having
4% of the world’s population.
The sit-in and protests started Wednesday, April 11, after
Harold Craft, Vice President of Administration and Chief Financial Officer,
released a statement saying that while he personally supported the goals of the
Kyoto Now movement, there was no way that Cornell could commit to them at this
time. Craft pointed out that Cornell has already taken several important steps
towards reducing its energy expenditures, such as the implementation of Lake
Source Cooling, the use of natural gas vehicles, and the switch to more
efficient light bulbs. He said that for Cornell to commit to the Kyoto
standards, a better understanding of the details was needed so that
administrators would know where changes would have to be made, and exactly what
it would cost. He also said that such a commitment would require the support of
a coalition of faculty, deans, students, and other sectors of the Cornell
community. After this statement was read by Frankie Lind of the Greens, dozens
of supporters followed Lind to Day Hall, where six students and an alumnus began
their sit-in. These seven activists pledged to remain in Day Hall until the
commitment was made.
|
The
kickoff rally was the first of several held in front of Day Hall in the ensuing
week. Finally, on Monday, April 16, administrators met with six members of the
Cornell Greens to work on an agreement. Some progress was made in the
negotiations, but the day ended without a deal—the two sides still differed on
important details. Meanwhile, over 100 supporters of the Kyoto Now movement
gathered outside the building for the "Kyotopalooza" rally.
Demonstrators chanted their support and listened to poetry readings as well as
performances by the Key Elements and other local musicians. Petitions continued
to circulate, generating well over three thousand signatures in support of the
Kyoto Now movement, which qualifies it as one of the most successful petition
drives on campus in recent memory. Negotiations resumed the following day,
culminating in the historic agreement.
According to Hank Dullea, Vice President of University
Relations, the two sides never differed on the objective, but only on the
specifics of what a commitment would entail. In addition to establishing the
goal of a 7% reduction below 1990 levels by 2008, the settlement called for the
creation of a committee to oversee progress, comprising faculty, staff, and
students, including members of campus governance committees and student groups.
The Greens declared this decision a great victory for the environment, but added
that the next step is to make sure that these goals are indeed met, something
that the University has admitted will be very difficult. Activist David Unger
summed up the decision on these words, quoted in the Daily Sun: "This is a
great victory, but it is only the first. Now it’s up to the University, the
Greens, and the community to ensure that this commitment results in a real
change."
a
|
 |